4.7 Article

Integrated analysis of copy number alterations and gene expression: a bivariate assessment of equally directed abnormalities

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages 3228-3235

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp592

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 475]
  2. European Leukemia Network of Excellence [LSHC-CT-2004]
  3. COST [BM0801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: The analysis of a number of different genetic features like copy number (CN) variation, gene expression (GE) or loss of heterocygosity has considerably increased in recent years, as well as the number of available datasets. This is particularly due to the success of microarray technology. Thus, to understand mechanisms of disease pathogenesis on a molecular basis, e. g. in cancer research, the challenge of analyzing such different data types in an integrated way has become increasingly important. In order to tackle this problem, we propose a new procedure for an integrated analysis of two different data types that searches for genes and genetic regions which for both inputs display strong equally directed deviations from the reference median. We employ this approach, based on a modified correlation coefficient and an explorative Wilcoxon test, to find DNA regions of such abnormalities in GE and CN (e. g. underexpressed genes accompanied by a loss of DNA material). Results: In an application to acute myeloid leukemia, our procedure is able to identify various regions on different chromosomes with characteristic abnormalities in GE and CN data and shows a higher sensitivity to differences in abnormalities than standard approaches. While the results support various findings of previous studies, some new interesting DNA regions can be identified. In a simulation study, our procedure also shows more reliable results than standard approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available