4.7 Article

The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention - An event-related fMRI study

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 2273-2288

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2273

Keywords

neglect; saccades; covert attention shifts; functional MRI; parietal cortex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visual neglect occurs most frequently and persistently after lesions that include the right supramarginal gyrus (SMG), a part of the inferior parietal lobule, Patients with this syndrome make very few saccades to the left, and show abnormal performance on tasks in which they must covertly shift their attention to the left, suggesting that the right SMG is involved in the generation of saccades and attention shifts, Functional imaging studies of saccades and covert attention shifts in the normal brain, however, have shown weak or absent responses in both SMGs, We used event-related functional MRI to rec examine the responses to saccades and attention shifts within a single experiment, and to assess responses to left- and right-sided stimuli independently. When subjects made saccades to peripheral stimuli, the expected responses were seen in striate and prestriate cortex, the superior parietal lobules, the frontal eye fields, the supplementary motor area and the anterior insulae, In addition there was a response in the right SMG but not in the left SMG, as predicted from the clinical literature. When subjects made a covert visual assessment of the peripheral stimulus without any saccade, greater activity was seen in all of the areas in the frontoparietal network, Each area showed a bias towards contralateral stimuli, with two exceptions: the anterior insulae gave mainly ipsilateral responses, whilst the right SMG gave equal responses to right- and left-sided stimuli. These findings are discussed in the context of current theories pertaining to the clinical syndrome of neglect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available