4.7 Article

Prioritizing risk pathways: a novel association approach to searching for disease pathways fusing SNPs and pathways

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 237-242

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn613

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National High Tech Development Project of China
  2. 863 Program [2007AA02Z329]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30571034, 30570424]
  4. National Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Provinc [D2007-48]
  5. Master Innovation Funds of Harbin Medical University [HCXS 2008010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: Complex diseases are generally thought to be under the influence of one or more mutated risk genes as well as genetic and environmental factors. Many traditional methods have been developed to identify susceptibility genes assuming a single-gene disease model ('single-locus methods'). Pathway-based approaches, combined with traditional methods, consider the joint effects of genetic factor and biologic network context. With the accumulation of high-throughput SNP datasets and human biologic pathways, it becomes feasible to search for risk pathways associated with complex diseases using bioinformatics methods. By analyzing the contribution of genetic factor and biologic network context in KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways, we proposed an approach to prioritize risk pathways for complex diseases: Prioritizing Risk Pathways fusing SNPs and pathways (PRP). A risk-scoring (RS) measurement was used to prioritize risk biologic pathways. This could help to demonstrate the pathogenesis of complex diseases from a new perspective and provide new hypotheses. We introduced this approach to five complex diseases and found that these five diseases not only share common risk pathways, but also have their specific risk pathways, which is verified by literature retrieval.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available