4.6 Article

The infall region of Abell 576: Independent mass and light profiles

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages 2338-2354

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/316811

Keywords

cosmology : observations; dark matter; galaxies : clusters : individual (A576); galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; galaxies : photometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe observations of the nearby (cz = 11,487 km s(-1)) cluster of galaxies Abell 576 beyond the virial radius and into the infall region where galaxies are on their first or second pass through the cluster. Using 1057 redshifts, we use the infall pattern in redshift space to determine the mass profile of A576 to a radius of similar to4 h(-1) Mpc. This mass estimation technique makes no assumptions about the equilibrium state of the cluster. Within similar to1 h(-1) Mpc, the mass profile we derive exceeds that determined from X-ray observations by a factor of similar to2.5. At similar to2.5 h(-1) Mpc, however, the mass profile agrees with virial mass estimates. Our mass profile is consistent with a Navarro, Frenk, & White or Hernquist profile, but it is inconsistent with an isothermal sphere. R-band images of a 3 degrees x 3 degrees region centered on the cluster allow an independent determination of the cluster light profile. We calculate the integrated mass-to-light ratio as a function of cluster radius; it decreases smoothly from the core to M/L-R similar to 300 h at similar to4 h(-1) Mpc. The differential MIL, profile decreases more steeply; we find deltaM/deltaL(R) similar to 100 h at similar to4 h(-1) Mpc, in good agreement with the mass-to-light ratios of individual galaxies. If the behavior of M/L-R in A576 is general, Omega (m) less than or similar to 0.4 at 95% confidence. For a Hernquist model, the best-fit mass profiles differ from the observed surface number density of galaxies; the galaxies have a larger scale radius than the mass. This result is consistent with the centrally peaked M/L-R profile. Similarly, the scale radius of the light profile is larger than that of the mass profile. We discuss some potential systematic effects; none can easily reconcile our results with a constant mass-to-light ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available