4.6 Article

Reconstructing terrestrial nutrient cycling using stable nitrogen isotopes in wood

Journal

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 120, Issue 1-3, Pages 1-21

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-014-9988-8

Keywords

Nitrogen availability; Dendrochronology; delta N-15; Dendroecology; Tree rings; Nitrogen deposition

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-DEB 1145815]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Emerging Frontiers [1145815] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although recent anthropogenic effects on the global nitrogen (N) cycle have been significant, the consequences of increased anthropogenic N on terrestrial ecosystems are unclear. Studies of the impact of increased reactive N on forest ecosystems-impacts on hydrologic and gaseous loss pathways, retention capacity, and even net primary productivity-have been particularly limited by a lack of long-term baseline biogeochemical data. Stable nitrogen isotope analysis (ratio of N-15 to N-14, termed delta N-15) of wood chronologies offers the potential to address changes in ecosystem N cycling on millennial timescales and across broad geographic regions. Currently, nearly 50 studies have been published utilizing wood delta N-15 records; however, there are significant differences in study design and data interpretation. Here, we identify four categories of wood delta N-15 studies, summarize the common themes and primary findings of each category, identify gaps in the spatial and temporal scope of current wood delta N-15 chronologies, and synthesize methodological frameworks for future research by presenting eight suggestions for common methodological approaches and enhanced integration across studies. Wood delta N-15 records have the potential to provide valuable information for interpreting modern biogeochemical cycling. This review serves to advance the utility of this technique for long-term biogeochemical reconstructions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available