Journal
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 247-269Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-014-9958-1
Keywords
Carbon quality; Fluorescence excitation-emission matrices; Stream channelization; Stream daylighting; Transient storage; Tracer injection
Funding
- EPA NNEMS [2010-309]
- NSF [DBI 0640300, CBET 1058502, DGE-1144243]
- NASA [NASA NNX11AM28G]
- Maryland Sea Grant Awards [SA7528085-U, R/WS-2, NA05OAR4171042]
- Baltimore Ecosystem Study LTER project [NSF DEB-0423476]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development
- Directorate For Engineering
- Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1058502] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Urbanization has resulted in the extensive burial and channelization of headwater streams, yet little is known about the impacts of stream burial on ecosystem functions critical for reducing downstream nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) exports. In order to characterize the biogeochemical effects of stream burial on N and C, we measured NO3 (-) uptake (using N-15-NO3 (-) isotope tracer releases) and gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER) (using whole stream metabolism measurements). Experiments were carried out during four seasons, in three paired buried and open stream reaches, within the Baltimore Ecosystem Study Long-term Ecological Research site. Stream burial increased NO3 (-) uptake lengths by a factor of 7.5 (p < 0.01) and decreased NO3 (-) uptake velocity and areal NO3 (-) uptake rate by factors of 8.2 (p < 0.05) and 9.6 (p < 0.001), respectively. Stream burial decreased GPP by a factor of 11.0 (p < 0.01) and decreased ER by a factor of 5.0 (p < 0.05). From fluorescence Excitation Emissions Matrices analysis, buried streams were found to have significantly altered C quality, showing less labile dissolved organic matter. Furthermore, buried streams had significantly lower transient storage (TS) and water temperatures. Differences in NO3 (-) uptake, GPP, and ER in buried streams, were primarily explained by decreased TS, light availability, and C quality, respectively. At the watershed scale, we estimate that stream burial decreases NO3 (-) uptake by 39 % and C production by 194 %. Overall, our results suggest that stream burial significantly impacts NO3 (-) uptake, stream metabolism, and the quality of organic C exported from watersheds. Given the large impacts of stream burial on stream ecosystem processes, daylighting or de-channelization of streams, through hydrologic floodplain reconnection, may have the potential to alter ecosystem functions in urban watersheds, when used appropriately.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available