4.6 Article

Atmospheric methane uptake by tropical montane forest soils and the contribution of organic layers

Journal

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 111, Issue 1-3, Pages 469-483

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-011-9681-0

Keywords

Methane uptake; Carbon dioxide; Trace gases; Tropical montane forests; Organic layers; Elevation gradient; Topographic gradient; Gas diffusion barrier

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ve219/8-1 A2.2, Le762/10-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial oxidation in aerobic soils is the primary biotic sink for atmospheric methane (CH4), a powerful greenhouse gas. Although tropical forest soils are estimated to globally account for about 28% of annual soil CH4 consumption (6.2 Tg CH4 year(-1)), limited data are available on CH4 exchange from tropical montane forests. We present the results of an extensive study on CH4 exchange from tropical montane forest soils along an elevation gradient (1,000, 2,000, 3,000 m) at different topographic positions (lower slope, mid-slope, ridge position) in southern Ecuador. All soils were net atmospheric CH4 sinks, with decreasing annual uptake rates from 5.9 kg CH4-C ha(-1) year(-1) at 1,000 m to 0.6 kg CH4-C ha(-1) year(-1) at 3,000 m. Topography had no effect on soil atmospheric CH4 uptake. We detected some unexpected factors controlling net methane fluxes: positive correlations between CH4 uptake rates, mineral nitrogen content of the mineral soil and with CO2 emissions indicated that the largest CH4 uptake corresponded with favorable conditions for microbial activity. Furthermore, we found indications that CH4 uptake was N limited instead of inhibited by NH4 (+). Finally, we showed that in contrast to temperate regions, substantial high affinity methane oxidation occurred in the thick organic layers which can influence the CH4 budget of these tropical montane forest soils. Inclusion of elevation as a co-variable will improve regional estimates of methane exchange in these tropical montane forests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available