4.7 Article

Skewed T-cell receptor variable gene usage in the synovium of early and chronic rheumatoid arthritis patients and persistence of clonally expanded T cells in a chronic patient

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 11, Pages 1189-1201

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.11.1189

Keywords

rheumatoid arthritis; autoimmunity; T-cell receptor usage; clonal expansion; synovial T cells

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Autoreactive T cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied the T-cell receptor (TCR) V-gene repertoire in the blood and synovium of early and chronic RA patients using polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to evaluate possible differences between these patient groups. Results. Over-represented TCR V genes were observed in the synovium, but not in the blood of all RA patients (n = 38). The number of over-represented V genes was higher in the synovium of chronic RA patients (n = 31) than in that of early RA patients (n = 7). The V-gene profile was different among patients, and similar in the two knees for patients with bilateral synovitis (n = 5). The clonal composition of over-represented TCR BV genes in a patient with early RA and a patient with chronic RA was further studied by CDR3 region sequence analysis. A high level of clonal diversity was found in the joints and the blood of the early RA patient, suggesting a polyclonal T-cell expansion. In the chronic RA patient, predominant clonal expansions were observed in the blood and synovium, and some expanded clones were still present 2 yr later. Conclusions. The observation of similar T-cell populations in both joints in patients with bilateral synovitis and the persistence of clonally expanded T cells for more than 2 yr in the joints of a chronic RA patient may indicate a pathogenic role for these cells in the disease process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available