4.8 Article

Cloning and functional analysis of chicory root fructan1-exohydrolase I (1-FEH I): a vacuolar enzyme derivedfrom a cell-wall invertase ancestor? Mass fingerprint of the 1-FEH I enzyme

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 447-456

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00890.x

Keywords

1-FEH; inulin; Cichorium intybus; fructan breakdown; MALDI-TOF

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the cloning and functional analysis of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) fructan 1-exohydrolase I cDNA (1-FEH I). To our knowledge it is the first plant FEH cloned. Full-length cDNA was obtained by a combination of RT-PCR, 5' and 3' RACE using primers based on N-terminal and conserved amino acid sequences. Electrophoretically purified 1-FEH I enzyme was further analyzed by in-gel trypsin digestion followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization and electrospray time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Functionality of the cDNA was demonstrated by heterologous expression in potato tubers. 1-FEH I takes a new, distinct position in the phylogenetic tree of plant glycosyl hydrolases being more homologous to cell-wall invertases (44-53%) than to vacuolar invertases (38-41%) and fructosyl transferases (33-38%). The 1-FEH I enzyme could not be purified from the apoplastic fluid at significantly higher levels than can be explained by cellular leakage. These and other data suggest a vacuolar localization for 1-FEH I. Also, the pI of the enzyme (6.5) is lower than expected from a typical cell-wall invertase. Unlike plant fructosyl transferases that are believed to have evolved from a vacuolar invertase, 1-FEH I might have evolved from a cell-wall invertase-like ancestor gene that later obtained a vacuolar targeting signal. 1-FEH I mRNA quantities increase in the roots throughout autumn, and especially when roots are stored at low temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available