4.8 Article

B-form to A-form conversion by a 3′-terminal ribose:: crystal structure of the chimera d(CCACTAGTG)r(G)

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 21, Pages 4356-4363

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.21.4356

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [F32 GM017378, GM-17378] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal structure of the chimerical decamer d(CCACTAGTG)r(G), bearing a 3'-terminal riboguanidine, has been solved and refined at 1.8 Angstrom resolution (R-factor 16.6%; free R-factor 22.8%). The decamer crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P2(1)2(1)2(1) with unit cell constants a = 23.90 Angstrom, b = 45.76 Angstrom and c = 49.27 Angstrom. The structure was solved by molecular replacement using the coordinates of the isomorphous chimera r(GCG)d(TATACGC). The final model contains one duplex and 77 water molecules per asymmetric unit. Surprisingly, all residues adopt a conformation typical for A-form nucleic acids (C3'-endo type sugar pucker) although the all-DNA analog, d(CCACTAGTGG), has been crystallized in the B-form. Comparing circular dichroism spectra of the chimera and the corresponding all-DNA sequence reveals a similar trend of the former molecule to adopt an A-like conformation in solution. The results suggest that the preference of ribonucleotides for the A-form is communicated into the 5'-direction of an oligonucleotide strand, although direct interactions of the 2'-hydroxyl group can only be discerned with nucleotides in the 3'-direction of a C3'-endo puckered ribose. These observations imply that forces like water-mediated contacts, the concerted motions of backbone torsion angles, and stacking preferences, are responsible for such long-range influences. This bi-directional structural communication originating from a ribonucleotide can be expected to contribute to the stability of the A-form within all-RNA duplexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available