4.2 Article

Hydrocephalus induced by immunological blockage of the subcommissural organ-Reissner's fiber (RF) complex by maternal transfer of anti-RF antibodies

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages 41-52

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002210000474

Keywords

aqueduct stenosis; hydrocephalus; immunoneutralization; subcommissural organ; rat

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct seems to be a key event for the development of congenital hydrocephalus. The causes of such a stenosis are not well known. Overholser et al, in 1954 (Anat Rec 120:917-933) proposed the hypothesis that a dysfunction of the subcommissural organ (SCO) leads to aqueductal stenosis and congenital hydrocephalus. The SCO is a brain gland, located at the entrance of the cerebral aqueduct, that secretes glycoproteins into the cerebrospinal fluid that, upon release, assemble into a fibrous structure known as Reissner's fiber (RF). By the permanent addition of new molecules to its rostral end, RF grows and extends along the aqueduct, fourth ventricle, and central canal of the spinal cord. The immunological blockage of the SCO-RF complex has been used to test Overholser's hypothesis. The following was the sequence of events occurring in pregnant rats that had been immunized with RF glycoproteins: the mother produced anti-RF antibodies and transferred them to the fetus through the placenta and to the pup through the milk, and the antibodies reached the brain of the fetus and pup and blocked the SCO-RF complex. This resulted in a permanent absence of RF that was followed by stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct, and then by the appearance of hydrocephalus. The latter was patent until the end of the 6-month observation period. The chronic hydrocephalic state appeared, in turn, to induce new alterations of the SCO. It is concluded that a selective immunological knock out of the SCO-RF complex leads to hydrocephalus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available