4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The split hand in ALS has a cortical basis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 180, Issue 1-2, Pages 66-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-510X(00)00430-5

Keywords

ALS; corticomotoneuronal system; magnetic stimulation; thenar; hypothenar; fractionation; dexterity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss of highly fractionated movement involving the thumb and index finger is an early characteristic of hand dysfunction in many ALS patients. These movements are largely subserved by the 'thenar complex' including the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI), whereas the 'hypothenar complex', innervated by the same myotome, has less ability to fractionate and is relatively spared. This suggests that in ALS, hand dysfunction and wasting is related to corticomotoneuronal representation and input. To determine whether corticomotoneuronal input to the thenar spinal pool is preferentially impaired compared to the hypothenar spinal pool in ALS, we studied 18 ALS patients and 11 normal subjects. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the thenar and hypothenar complexes were evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation. In healthy control subjects the cortical/peripheral (MEP/CMAP) ratios were significantly larger for the thenar complex suggesting a stronger corticomotoneuronal input to this muscle complex (P < 0.005). This was not the case in ALS patients. Comparing the ratios between control subjects and patients revealed a significant reduction for the thenar complex (P < 0.02) in ALS patients but not for the hypothenar complex. We conclude that corticomotoneuronal input to the thenar complex is preferentially affected in ALS and that corticomotoneuronal disease may be the prime determinant of hand dysfunction and wasting. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available