4.5 Article

A techno-economic review of hydroprocessed renewable esters and fatty acids for jet fuel production

Journal

BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 89-96

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1378

Keywords

techno-economic model; hydroprocess renewable fuels; renewable jet fuel; middle distillates; DCFROR

Funding

  1. Federal Aviation Administration
  2. Air Force Research Labs through PARTNER [28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Jet fuels produced from sources other than petroleum are receiving considerable attention because they offer the potential to diversify energy supplies while mitigating the net environmental impacts of aviation. The hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) process is a commercially deployed technology that converts vegetable oils and animal fats from triglycerides into hydrocarbons suitable for use in diesel and jet fuels. The technical means of producing alternative fuels from renewable oils, and the resulting carbon intensity has been documented in previous work. However, the cost of production is not available in the literature. This work reviews HEFA fuel production, and estimates the gate price of fuel for several plant sizes and operating conditions. Aspen Plus was used to model biorefinery material and energy balances for unit operations and supporting utilities. A discounted-cash-flow-rate-of-return (DCFROR) economic model was used for sensitivity analysis. The gate price was found to range between $1.00 L1 for a 378 MML yr1 HEFA facility, and $1.16 L1 for a 116 MML yr1 facility. Maximizing jet fuel production ranged between $0.07 and $0.08 L1 due to increased hydrogen use and decreased diesel and jet fuel yield. While feedstock cost is the most significant portion of fuel cost, facility size, financing, and capacity utilization also influence production costs. (C) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available