4.7 Article

A bacterial artificial chromosome library for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and the identification of clones containing putative resistance genes

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages 1093-1099

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051584

Keywords

barley; BAC library; P-loop genes; resistance-gene analog (RGA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern cultivated barley is an important cereal crop with an estimated genome size of 5000 Mb. To develop the resources for positional cloning and structural genomic analyses in barley, we constructed a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library for the cultivar Morex using the cloning enzyme HindIII. The library contains 313334 clones (816 384-well plates). A random sampling of 504 clones indicated an average insert size of 106 kbp (range=30-195 kbp) and 3.4% empty vectors. Screening the colony filters for chloroplast DNA content indicated an exceptionally low 1.5% contamination with chloroplast DNA. Thus, the library provides 6.3 haploid genome equivalents allowing a >99% probability of recovering any specific sequence of interest. High-density filters were gridded robotically using a Genetix Q-BOT in a 4x4 double-spotted array on 22.5-cm(2) filters. Each set of 17 filters allows the entire library to be screened with 18432 clones represented pel filter. Screening the library with 40 single copy probes identified an average 6.4 clones per probe, with a range of 1-13 clones per probe. A set of resistance-gene analog (RGA) sequences identified 121 RGA-containing BAC clones representing 20 different regions of the genome with an average of 6.1 clones per locus. Additional screening of the library with a P-loop disease resistance primer probe identified 459 positive BAC clones. These data indicate that this library is a valuable resource for structural genomic applications in barley.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available