Journal
COGNITION & EMOTION
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 789-808Publisher
PSYCHOLOGY PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/02699930050156636
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Attentional biases for emotional faces were investigated in high, medium, and low anxiety groups (N = 54) using a probe detection task. Four types of facial expression (threat, sad, happy, neutral) were used to examine the specificity of the bias. Attentional bias measures were derived from manual reaction times (RTs) to probes and the direction of initial eye movement (EM) to the faces. The RT data indicated enhanced vigilance for threat rather than neutral faces in high and medium, but not low, state anxiety. The bias for negative faces appeared to be a combined function of stimulus threat value and the individual's anxiety level. The RT bias did not seem to depend on overt orienting, as many participants made few EMs. However, those who made frequent EMs to the faces showed concordance between the RT and EM bias measures, and so the RT measure of attentional bias for negative versus positive faces at 500 ms appears to provide a valid index of the direction of initial orienting to emotional stimuli. There was no evidence of an anxiety-related bias for happy faces (predicted by the emotionality hypothesis), nor a dysphoria-related bias for sad faces. However, increased dysphoria scores were associated with reduced attentiveness to happy faces.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available