4.6 Article

Indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the retinal internal limiting membrane

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages 2010-2014

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00375-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether indocyanine green (ICG) stains and facilitates peeling of the retinal internal limiting membrane (ILM). To investigate the different staining properties of the posterior cortical hyaloid, retinal ILM, and the retina after ILM removal. Design: Autopsy eye study. Materials: Eleven human cadaveric eyes. Methods: Open sky vitrectomy including removal of the posterior cortical vitreous was performed, A 0.5% ICG solution was then injected into the posterior vitreous cavity over the macula. The dye was allowed to settle on the macula for 5 minutes and was then removed by mechanical aspiration. Peeling of the ILM was initiated with a bent needle and completed with intraocular forceps. Specimens were submitted for light and electron microscopy. Main Outcome Measures: Staining properties and ease of peeling of retinal ILM were evaluated. Retinal ILM removal was confirmed by histopathologic and electron microscopic examination. Results: ICG contact with the retinal surface resulted in bright green staining of the ILM. This stain greatly facilitated ILM peeling by improving direct visualization of the membrane. The underlying retina did not stain, thus providing a clear distinction between the stained ILM and the unstained retina. Continuous circular peeling of the ILM was easily completed with this technique. Light microscopic and ultrastructural studies confirmed removal of the ILM. Conclusions: ICG solution distinctly stains the nearly invisible retinal ILM in human cadaveric eyes. ICG staining greatly facilitates ILM peeling by providing a stark contrast between the stained ILM and the unstained retina. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2010-2014 (C) 2000 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available