4.6 Article

Gas generation and overpressure: Effects on seismic attributes

Journal

GEOPHYSICS
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1769-1779

Publisher

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444861

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drilling of deep gas resources is hampered by high risk associated with unexpected overpressure zones. Knowledge of pore pressure using seismic data, as for instance from seismic-while-drilling techniques, will help producers plan the drilling process in real time to control potentially dangerous abnormal pressures. We assume a simple basin-evolution model with a constant sedimentation rate and a constant geothermal gradient. Oil/gas conversion starts at a given depth in a reservoir volume sealed with faults whose permeability is sufficiently low so that the increase in pressure caused by gas generation greatly exceeds the dissipation of pressure by flow. Assuming a first-order kinetic reaction, with a reaction rate satisfying the Arrhenius equation, the oil/gas conversion fraction is calculated. Balancing mass and volume fractions in the pore space yields the excess pore pressure and the fluid saturations. This excess pore pressure determines the effective pressure, which in turn determines the skeleton bulk moduli. If the generated gas goes into solution in the oil, this effect does not greatly change the depth and oil/gas conversion fraction for which the hydrostatic pressure approaches the lithostatic pressure. The seismic velocities versus pore pressure and differential pressure are computed by using a model for wave propagation in a porous medium saturated with oil and gas. Moreover, the velocities and attenuation factors versus frequency are obtained by including rock-frame/fluid viscoelastic effects to match ultrasonic experimental velocities. For the basin-evolution model used here, pore pressure is seismically visible when the effective pressure is less than about 15 MPa and the oil/gas conversion is about 2.5% percent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available