4.8 Article

Characterization of commercially available and synthesized polyethylenimines for gene delivery

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 309-322

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00317-5

Keywords

polycations; polyethylenimine; synthesis; buffer capacity; intrinsic viscosity; Mark-Houwink parameters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five new polyethylenimines (PEI) were synthesized by polymerization of aziridine in aqueous solution and compared to several commercially available PEI used for gene transfer. Polymers were characterized by C-13 NMR spectroscopy, capillary viscosimetry, potentiometric titration and Cu(II) complex formation to gain insight into structural and functional properties. C-13 NMR analysis revealed differences in the extent of branching based on the ratio of primary, secondary and tertiary amino groups. An amino group ratio 1 degrees :2 degrees :3 degrees =1:2:1 was obtained for the synthesized PEI, whereas commercially available PEI generally showed a higher degree of branching (1:1:1). Capillary viscosimetry of aqueous PEI solutions with a sufficient amount of salt gave Mark-Houwink parameters of alpha =0.26 and K-V=1.00 cm(3)/g for the commercially available polymers. In case of the synthesized polymers, variation of reaction conditions yielded viscosity average molar masses (M-v) in the range of 8000-24000 g/mol. PEI solutions were investigated by potentiometric titration analysis showing that their buffer capacity was not significantly influenced by molar mass or polymer structure. The pK(a) values (8.18-9.94) and the buffer capacity beta (0.08-0.014 mol/l) were of comparable magnitude. This study highlights the necessity of more detailed characterization methods for PEI used in gene transfer protocols since physico-chemical properties do not reflect the vast differences found in transfection efficiencies. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available