4.6 Article

Selective propylene dimerization to 2,3-dimethylbutenes by heterogenized polymer-supported β-dithioacetylacetonate nickel(II) precursors activated by organoaluminium co-catalysts

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 204, Issue 1, Pages 7-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00512-3

Keywords

heterogenized nickel catalysts; polymer-supported beta-dithioacetylacetonate nickel complexes; 2,3-dimethylbutenes; propylene oligomerization; tricyclohexylphosphine; organoaluminium co-catalysts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterogenized nickel catalysts, prepared in situ by anchoring nickel(II) phosphino complexes to polymer-bound beta -dithioacetylacetonate (sacsac) chelate ligands and activated by organoaluminium co-catalysts, have been employed for the selective propylene oligomerization to 2,3-dimethylbutenes (DMB). In particular, the effect of reaction conditions as well as of nature of phosphine ligand and organoaluminium activator was studied. The obtained data have shown that the above catalysts, at temperatures below 0 degreesC and in the presence of chlorobenzene as reaction medium, display a very high activity and selectivity to DMB, when basic and bulky alkyl phosphine ligands and organoaluminium co-catalysts of medium Lewis acidity are used. The performances given above are very similar to those obtained with the corresponding homogeneous catalysts. Flow experiments have allowed to check that the heterogenized catalysts given above are substantially stable, maintaining their performances during the time. No significant metal leaching was detected in the course of the reaction, at least under the adopted conditions, thus suggesting that these polymer-supported nickel catalysts behave as really heterogeneous catalysts, due to the presence of the bidentate sacsac ligand able to permanently fix the metal to the resin. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available