4.7 Article

Oculopharyngeal MD among Bukhara Jews is due to a founder (GCG)9 mutation in the PABP2 gene

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 1267-1270

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.55.9.1267

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether all cases of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) among Bukhara Jews share the same founder mutation. Background: Autosomal dominant OPMD is caused by a (GCG)(8-13) repeat expansion in the polyadenylation binding protein 2 (PABP2) gene. The disease has a worldwide distribution but is particularly prevalent in Bukhara Jews and in French Canadians, in whom it was introduced by three sisters in 1648. Methods: We established the size of the PABP2 mutation in 23 Bukhara Jewish patients belonging to eight unrelated families. In all families, we constructed haplotypes for the carrying chromosomes composed of the alleles for eight chromosome 14q polymorphic markers. Results: All patients share a (GCG)(9), PABP2 mutation and a four-marker haplotype. Furthermore, a shared intron single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the PABP2 gene 2.6Kb from the mutation was not observed in 22 families with (GCG)(9) mutations from nine different countries. The smaller size of the chromosomal region in linkage disequilibrium around the mutation in Bukhara Jews, as compared with French Canadians, suggests a founder effect that occurred more than 350 years ago. Based on the Luria-Delbruck corrected genetic clock, we estimate that the mutation appeared or was introduced once in the Bukhara Jewish population between AD 872 and 1512 (mean, AD 1243). Conclusion: OPMD among Bukhara Jews is the result of a shared, historically distinct, PABP2 (GCG), mutation that likely arose or was introduced in this population at the time they first settled in Bukhara and Samarkand during the 13th or 14th centuries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available