4.6 Article

Characterization of the heparin-binding properties of IL-6

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 10, Pages 5671-5679

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.10.5671

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We establish, using an ELISA approach, that recombinant human and murine IL-6 bind to an immobilized heparin-BSA complex. In the case of human IL-6, this binding is displaceable by soluble heparin, IC50 similar to2 mug/ml, corresponding to similar to 200 nM. This binding Is specific because chondroitin sulfates B and C fail to compete, whereas chondroitin sulfate A and several heparan sulfates are weak inhibitors. Of a range of chemically modified heparins examined, the strongest competitor was the 2-O-desulfated product, but even this showed a considerably reduced IC50 (similar to 30 mug/ml). The epitopes of five IL-6-specific mAbs were still accessible in heparin-bound IL-6, and the dimer formed from the association of rIL-6 with its truncated soluble receptor polypeptide, srIL-6 alpha, still bound to heparin, Further analysis showed that heparin competed partially and weakly with the binding of srIL-6 to IL-6; however, it competed strongly for the binding of the rIL-6/srIL-6R alpha dimer, to soluble glycoprotein 130. In studies of the proliferation of IL-6-sensitive Ba/F3 cells expressing glycoprotein 130, we were unable to detect any effect of either the removal of cell surface heparan sulfate, or addition of soluble heparin, By contrast, heparin was able to protect IL-6 from digestion by the bacterial endoproteinase Lys-C. Overall, our findings show that IL-6 is a heparin-binding cytokine. This interaction will tend to retain IL-6 close to its sites of secretion in the tissues by binding to heparin-like glycosaminoglycans, thus favoring a paracrine mode of activity, Moreover, this binding may serve to protect the IL-6 from proteolytic degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available