4.7 Article

Mortality rates among carriers of ataxia-telangiectasia mutant alleles

Journal

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 133, Issue 10, Pages 770-778

Publisher

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-10-200011210-00009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 14235] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mutations at the ataxia-telangiectasia locus cause a distinctive autosomal recessive syndrome in homozygotes and predispose heterozygotes to cancer and ischemic heart disease. Objective: To examine mortality rates among persons carrying a mutated ataxia-telangiectasia gene. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The United States and Canada. Participants: 405 grandparents of patients with ataxia-telangiectasia. Measurements: Ages at death and risk for death (from all causes, cancer, ischemic heart disease, and other causes) among carriers and noncarriers of ataxia-telangiectasia mutations. Results: Compared with noncarriers, carriers of a mutated ataxia-telangiectasia allele had a significantly increased risk for death at 20 through 79 years of age (relative risk, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8]) (P < 0.001). On average, carriers died 7 to 8 years earlier than noncarriers. Cancer caused most of the excess deaths, and ischemic heart disease caused the remainder. Among carriers, relative risk for death from cancer and ischemic heart disease before 80 years of age was 2.6 (CI, 1.4 to 4.7; P = 0.002) and 2.0 (CI, 1.0 to 4.0; P = 0.062), respectively. Compared with noncarriers, carriers who died of cancer were a mean of 4 years younger (P > 0.2) and carriers who died of ischemic heart disease were a mean of 11 years younger (P = 0.006). Conclusion: Carriers of mutations at the ataxia-telangiectasia locus, who make up 1.4% to 2% of the general population, have a higher mortality rate and an earlier age at death from cancer and ischemic heart disease than noncarriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available