4.7 Review

Logical models of argument

Journal

ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 337-383

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/371578.371581

Keywords

defeasible argumentation; argumentative systems; defeasible reasoning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Logical models of argument formalize commonsense reasoning while taking process and computation seriously. This survey discusses the main ideas that characterize different logical models of argument. It presents the formal features of a few main approaches to the modeling of argumentation. We trace the evolution of argumentation from the mid-1980s, when argument systems emerged as an alternative to nonmonotonic formalisms based on classical logic, to the present, as argument is embedded in different complex systems for real-world applications, and allows more formal work to be done in different areas, such as AI and Law, case-based reasoning and negotiation among intelligent agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available