4.4 Review

Does CTCF mediate between nuclear organization and gene expression?

Journal

BIOESSAYS
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 37-50

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/bies.200900118

Keywords

chromatin; epigenetics; gene expression; higher order structure

Funding

  1. Swedish Science Research Council
  2. Swedish Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Swedish Pediatric Cancer Foundation
  4. Lundberg Foundation
  5. HEROIC
  6. ChILL
  7. NIAID/NIH
  8. Medical Research Council, UK
  9. Breast Cancer Campaign, UK
  10. Breast Cancer Research Trust, UK
  11. University of Essex, UK
  12. Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust, UK
  13. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001021, ZIAAI000860] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  14. Medical Research Council [G0401088] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. MRC [G0401088] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multifunctional zinc-finger protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is a very strong candidate for the role of coordinating the expression level of coding sequences with their three-dimensional position in the nucleus, apparently responding to a code in the DNA itself. Dynamic interactions between chromatin fibers in the context of nuclear architecture have been implicated in various aspects of genome functions. However, the molecular basis of these interactions still remains elusive and is a subject of intense debate. Here we discuss the nature of CTCF-DNA interactions, the CTCF-binding specificity to its binding sites and the relationship between CTCF and chromatin, and we examine data linking CTCF with gene regulation in the three-dimensional nuclear space. We discuss why these features render CTCF a very strong candidate for the role and propose a unifying model, the CTCF code, explaining the mechanistic basis of how the information encrypted in DNA may be interpreted by CTCF into diverse nuclear functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available