4.7 Article

On the six-jump cycle mechanism of self-diffusion in NiAl

Journal

INTERMETALLICS
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 1357-1368

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-9795(00)00062-5

Keywords

nickel aluminides, based on NiAl; diffusion; defects : point defects; simulations, atomistic; simulations, Monte Carlo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For a detailed interpretation of recent new experimental results on self-diffusion in NiAl (Divinski SV, Frank St, Herzig Chr, Sodervall U. Solid State Fenomena 2000;72:203) molecular static calculations were applied to compute the energy barriers corresponding to general six-jump cycles in NiAl. It was found that the [110] six-jump cycle involves the lowest migration barriers among other possible cycles in the B2 structure of NiAl and has the highest probability to be accomplished. The attempt frequencies of different jumps were calculated within the quasiharmonic approximation. The Monte-Carlo approach with residence-time algorithm was then applied to compute the diffusional correlation effects. The temperature dependence of the Ni diffusion coefficient by the six-jump mechanism was found to obey the Arrhenius law D-0 exp{-Q/kT} with D-0 congruent to 1.3 x 10(-5)m(2)s(-1) and Q congruent to 3.12eV in the temperature interval from 800 to 1500 K. These values agree well with our experimental results for Ni-63 tracer diffusion [D-o congruent to (3.6+/-(1.6)(1.1)) x 10(-5)m(2)s(-1), Q congruent to 3.01 +/- 0.04eV], in single crystalline NiAl samples of stoichiometric composition. However, the analysis predicts that the six-jump cycles may be easily broken if the vacancy meets some specific configurations. The resulting contribution of the six-jump cycle mechanism to the total Ni diffusivity was estimated to be; smaller than about 30% at lower temperatures (less than or equal to 1100K) and perfect stoichiometric composition. With deviation from the stoichiometry and/or increase of temperature the effectiveness of the six-jump cycles decreases rapidly. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available