4.5 Article

Characterization of Bio-oil and Bio-char from Pyrolysis of Palm Oil Wastes

Journal

BIOENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 830-840

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-013-9313-8

Keywords

Palm shell; Empty fruit bunches; Mesocarp fiber; Pyrolysis; Bio-oil; Bio-char

Funding

  1. University of Malaya through the Bright Sparks Program
  2. University of Malaya through the Postgraduate Research Grant
  3. University of Malaya through the HIR [D000011-16001, D000020-16001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The residues from the palm oil industry are the main contributors to biomass waste in Malaysia, and these wastes require extra attention with respect to handling. The biomass waste is a renewable resource that can potentially be used to produce absorbents, fuels, and chemical feedstocks through the pyrolysis process. In this study, the wastes of palm shell, empty fruit bunches, and mesocarp fiber were characterized and then pyrolyzed in a fixed-bed reactor under the following conditions: a temperature of 500 A degrees C, a nitrogen flow rate of 2 L/min and reaction time of 60 min. After pyrolysis, characterization of the products with an emphasis on the bio-oil and the bio-char was performed using various approaches (including Karl Fischer water-content tests, FTIR, SEM, TGA and CNH/O analyses). The results showed that the pyrolysis of palm oil wastes yielded more bio-oil than bio-char or non-condensable gases. The results also indicated that all of the bio-oils were acidic and contained high levels of oxygen. The bio-oils heating values were low and varied from 10.49 MJ/kg to 14.78 MJ/kg. The heating values of the bio-chars (20-30 MJ/kg) were higher than those of the bio-oils. Among the biomasses studied in this work, palm shell contained the highest level of lignin and showed the highest levels of bio-char yield and fixed and elemental carbon in the raw and bio-char form.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available