Journal
JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue 6, Pages 609-617Publisher
ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80003-6
Keywords
carbon assimilation; nitrate assimilation; nitrogen fixation; nitrogen nutrition; pea; Pisum sativum L.; water stress
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The effect of the source of nitrogen nutrition (nitrogen fixation or nitrate assimilation) on the response of pea plants to a gradual and moderate water stress was studied. Growth declined under water deficit, but nodulated plants were less sensitive to drought than nitrate-fed plants. Stomatal conductance and internal CO2 concentration also decreased, but both were higher in nitrogen-fixing plants throughout the drought period, leading to better maintenance of carbon assimilation rates under water deficit. Glycolate oxidase, a key enzyme in the photorespiratory cycle, declined by 50 % in nitrogen-fixing plants under water deficit, although it was not affected in nitrate-fed plants. Nitrogen assimilation declined during the drought period and was independent of nitrogen source. Free amino acid content declined in leaves of plants grown under both nutrition regimes, reflecting the decrease in nitrogen assimilation. Water stress led to carbohydrate accumulation in pea plants grown with either nitrogen source, but it was higher in nitrogen-fixing plants. Roots showed the greatest carbohydrate and amino acid accumulation in both nutritions regimes, with significantly greater increases in free amino acids in nitrate-fed plants. It is concluded that the nitrogen source is a major factor affecting pea responses to water stress, although the difference in sensitivity seems to be related not to the nitrogen assimilation process but to complex interactions with photorespiratory flux and stomatal conductance.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available