4.5 Article

Biomass Yield and Quality of Reed Canarygrass under Five Harvest Management Systems for Bioenergy Production

Journal

BIOENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 111-119

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-010-9105-3

Keywords

Bioenergy; Biomass; Harvest management; Reed canarygrass

Funding

  1. Department of Energy's Bioenergy Feedstock Development Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory [90X-SY510V]
  2. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
  3. University of Wisconsin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reed canarygrass, Phalaris arundinacea L., produces high biomass yields in cool climates and wetlands. The number and timing of harvests during a growing season directly affect biomass yield and biofuel quality. In order to determine optimum harvest management, seven cultivars of reed canarygrass were planted in field experiments at Ames, IA; McNay, IA; and Arlington, WI in the upper Midwestern USA and harvested once in autumn or in winter, twice in spring + autumn or spring + winter, or three times during the season as hay. Biomass yield varied considerably among harvest treatments, locations, and years, ranging up to 12.6 Mg ha(-1). Dry matter percentage ranged from 37% for spring-harvested biomass to 84% for overwintered biomass. The three harvest hay and two harvest spring + autumn managements produced the highest biomass yield compared to other systems, but the advantage, if any, of hay management was small and probably does not justify the cost of additional fieldwork. More mature biomass, such as that found in the single harvest systems, had higher fiber concentrations. Overwintered biomass had superior biofuel quality, being low in P, K, S, and Cl and high in cell wall concentration. However, winter harvest systems had lower yield than autumn harvest and in some years, no harvest was possible due to lodging from snow compaction. The main limitation of a two harvest system is the high moisture content of the late spring/early summer biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available