4.2 Article

Multigenerational Effects of Whole Body Exposure to 2.14 GHz W-CDMA Cellular Phone Signals on Brain Function in Rats

Journal

BIOELECTROMAGNETICS
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 497-511

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bem.21871

Keywords

electromagnetic field; rat; whole-body exposure; multigeneration; brain function

Funding

  1. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present experimental study was carried out with rats to evaluate the effects of whole body exposure to 2.14GHz band code division multiple access (W-CDMA) signals for 20h a day, over three generations. The average specific absorption rate (SAR, in unit of W/kg) for dams was designed at three levels: high (<0.24W/kg), low (<0.08W/kg), and 0 (sham exposure). Pregnant mothers (4rats/group) were exposed from gestational day (GD) 7 to weaning and then their offspring (F-1 generation, 4males and 4females/dam, respectively) were continuously exposed until 6 weeks of age. The F-1 females were mated with F-1 males at 11 weeks old, and then starting from GD 7, they were exposed continuously to the electromagnetic field (EMF; one half of the F1 offspring was used for mating, that is, two of each sex per dam and 8males and 8females/group, except for all offspring for the functional development tests). This protocol was repeated in the same manner on pregnant F-2 females and F-3 pups; the latter were killed at 10 weeks of age. No abnormalities were observed in the mother rats (F-0, F-1, and F-2) and in the offspring (F-1, F-2, and F-3) in any biological parameters, including neurobehavioral function. Thus, it was concluded that under the experimental conditions applied, multigenerational whole body exposure to 2.14GHz W-CDMA signals for 20h/day did not cause any adverse effects on the F-1, F-2, and F-3 offspring. Bioelectromagnetics. 35:497-511, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available