4.7 Article

Voltammetric determination of amlodipine besylate in human urine and pharmaceuticals

Journal

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages 234-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2010.06.004

Keywords

Amlodipine besylate; Voltammetry; Carbon nanotube; Pyrolytic graphite; Human urine

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi [01(1815)/02/EMR-II]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical determination of amlodipine besylate (ADB) using single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes (SWNT/EPPGE and MWNT/EPPGE) is described by using cyclic and square wave voltammetries at physiological pH 7.2. An increased peak current with a shift of peak potential to less positive value was observed using carbon nanotubes modified EPPGE as compared to bare electrode. The effect of pH, scan rate and analyte concentration has been examined. Under the optimum conditions the peak current was linear to the concentration of amlodipine in the range 5.0 x 10(-9) to 1.0 x 10(-6) mol L-1 for SWNT/ EPPGE and the detection limit was found to be 1.0 x 10(-9) mol L-1 whereas, for MWNT/EPPGE the detection limit was found to be 5.0 x 10(-9) mol L-1. The method was successfully used to determine the content of amlodipine in the pharmaceutical preparations and human urine samples of angina patients undergoing treatment with amlodipine. A comparison of electrocatalytic activities of SWNT and MWNT modified electrodes indicated that SWNT modified EPPGE is similar to 1.8 times more sensitive in comparison to MWNT/EPPGE. Biological relevance of the developed method has been described by the determination of amlodipine in human body fluids. Amlodipine can be determined without any interference from common urine metabolites such as uric acid, ascorbic acid and xanthine. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available