4.7 Article

Designing nanomaterial-enhanced electrochemical immunosensors for cancer biomarker proteins

Journal

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 76, Issue 1-2, Pages 189-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.03.011

Keywords

Electrochemical immunosensors; Nanotubes; Nanoparticles; Cancer biomarkers; Prostate specific antigen

Funding

  1. NIEHS/NIH [ES013557]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES013557] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detection of multiple cancer biomarker proteins in human serum and tissue at point-of-care is a viable approach for early cancer detection, but presents a major challenge to bioanalytical device development. This article reviews recent approaches developed in our laboratories combining nanoparticle decorated electrodes and multilabeled secondary antibody labeled particles to achieve high sensitivity for the detection of cancer biomarker proteins. Two nano material-based sensor platforms were used: (a) upright single wall carbon nanotube forests and (b) layers of densely packed 5 nm gold nanoparticles. Both platforms feature pendant carboxylate groups for easy attachment of enzymes or antibodies by amidization. In quality performance tests, the biocatalytic responses for determination of hydrogen peroxide of AuNP layers with attached horseradish peroxidase (HRP) on electrodes gave somewhat better detection limit and sensitivity than single wall carbon nanotube (SWNT) forest platforms with HRP attached. Evaluation of these sensors as platforms for sandwich immunoassays for cancer biomarker prostate specific antigen (PSA) in serum showed that both approaches gave accurate results for human serum samples from cancer patients. The best detection limit (0.5 pg mL(-1)) and sensitivity were obtained by combining the AuNP immunosensors with binding of I pm diameter magnetic particles decorated with secondary antibodies and 7500 HRP labels. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available