4.6 Article

Development of spontaneous mammary tumors in BALB/c p53 heterozygous mice -: A model for Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue 6, Pages 2151-2159

Publisher

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64853-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA66670, CA25215, R01 CA025215] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor type among women in the United States and in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. The p53 tumor suppressor gene is altered in a large proportion of both spontaneous breast malignancies and Li-Fraumeni breast cancers. This suggests that loss of p53 can accelerate breast tumorigenesis, yet p53-deficient mice rarely develop mammary tumors. To evaluate the effect of p53 loss on mammary tumor formation, the p53(null) allele was back-crossed onto the BALB/c genetic background. Median survival was 15.4 weeks for BALB/c-p53(-/-) mice compared to 54 weeks for BALB/c-p53(+/-) mice. Sarcomas and lymphomas were the most frequent tumor types in BALB/c-p53(-/-) mice, whereas 55% of the female BALB/c-p53(+/-) mice developed mammary carcinomas. The mammary tumors were highly aneuploid, frequently lost the remaining wild-type p53 allele, but rarely lost BRCA1. Although mammary tumors were rarely detected in BALB/c-p53(-/-) female mice, when glands from BALB/ c-p53(-/-) mice were transplanted into wild-type BALB/c hosts, 75% developed mammary tumors. The high rate of mammary tumor development in the BALB/c background, but not C57Bl/6 or 129/Sv, suggests a genetic predisposition toward mammary tumorigenesis. Therefore, the BALB/c-p53(+/-) mice provide a unique model for the study of breast cancer in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. These results demonstrate the critical role that the p53 tumor suppressor gene plays in preventing tumorigenesis in the mammary gland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available