4.7 Article

Renal fibrosis in mice treated with human recombinant transforming growth factor-β2

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 2367-2376

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00420.x

Keywords

kidney fibrosis; hypoxia; transforming growth factor-beta 2; vasoconstriction; ischemia; glomerular filtration rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The biologic responses to transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) suggest many potential therapeutic applications; however, in the only clinical trial to examine the effect of the systemic administration of a TGF-beta isoform, patients experienced significant but reversible declines in renal function. We studied the effects of administering human recombinant TGF-beta2 to adult mice. Methods. The effect of daily administration of TGF-beta2 on tissue vasoconstriction, tissue levels of endothelin and angiotensin II, tissue hypoxia, and renal fibrosis were examined. Results. Daily administration of TGF-beta2 at 10 or 100 mug/kg caused apparent tissue vasoconstriction that was visualized by vascular casting, with the largest impact seen in the kidney. Tissue levels of endothelin 1 and angiotensin II were significantly elevated in kidneys of treated mice, as was urinary thromboxane beta (2). Renal fibrosis was observed in the cortical tubular interstitium and vasculature, particularly at the cortical-medullary junction and medullary vasa recta; however, glomerular sclerosis was not observed. Fibrosis was correlated to focal tissue hypoxia as determined by immunohistochemical detection of tissue bound pimondazole. Conclusion. We conclude that there are significant histopathologic consequences, focused in the kidney, resulting from the daily administration of high doses of human recombinant TGF-beta2, and we propose that selective vascular constriction with consequent tissue hypoxia is a contributing factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available