4.5 Article

A fibril reinforced nonhomogeneous poroelastic model for articular cartilage: inhomogeneous response in unconfined compression

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages 1533-1541

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00153-6

Keywords

biomechanics; cartilage; heterogeneity; poroelasticity; nonlinear

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The depth dependence of material properties of articular cartilage, known as the zonal differences, is incorporated into a nonlinear fibril-reinforced poroelastic model developed previously in order to explore the significance of material heterogeneity in the mechanical behavior of cartilage. The material variations proposed are based on extensive observations. The collagen fibrils are modeled as a distinct constituent which reinforces the other two constituents representing proteoglycans and water. The Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of the drained nonfibrillar matrix are so determined that the aggregate compressive modulus for confined geometry fits the experimental data. Three nonlinear factors are considered, i.e. the effect of finite deformation, the dependence of permeability on dilatation and the fibril stiffening with its tensile strain. Solutions are extracted using a finite element procedure to simulate unconfined compression tests. The features of the model are then demonstrated with an emphasis on the results obtainable only with a nonhomogeneous model, showing reasonable agreement with experiments. The model suggests mechanical behaviors significantly different from those revealed by homogeneous models: not only the depth variations of the strains which are expected by qualitative analyses, but also, for instance, the relaxation-time dependence of the axial strain which is normally not expected in a relaxation test. Therefore, such a nonhomogeneous model is necessary for better understanding of the mechanical behavior of cartilage. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available