4.6 Article

Proliferation index of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: Correlations with clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up results

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 1313-1318

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200012000-00009

Keywords

Ki-67; nonfunctioning adenoma; pituitary neoplasm; pituitary surgery; proliferation markers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The recurrence of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) after surgical removal is common. The aim of our study was to investigate and correlate the growth fraction of NFPAs with clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up results. METHODS: Tumor specimens were obtained from 101 consecutive patients with NFPAs (48 female patients and 53 male patients; mean age, 52.0 +/- 1.5 yr). Specimens were immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin and then embedded in paraffin. The Ki-67 antigen was assessed by immunocytochemical analysis using the monoclonal antibody MIB-1. The Ki-67 antigen labeling index (LI) was determined by counting a total of at least 1000 neoplastic nuclei. RESULTS: The mean Ki-67 LI for the 101 patients was 2.4 +/- 0.3% (range, 0-23.0%). Only age at surgery was inversely correlated with the Ki-67 LI; sex, maximal tumor diameter, and invasiveness into the cavernous sinuses did not significantly affect the Ki-67 LI. The mean follow-up period was 39.7 +/- 2.1 months. During follow-up monitoring, 23 patients experienced tumor recurrence, after a mean period of 28.6 +/- 4.8 months. Invasiveness of the tumor on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans was the strongest predictor of late tumor recurrence, followed by previous pituitary surgery, younger age, and lack of postoperative radiotherapy. The Ki-67 LI had no independent prognostic value. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the clinical characteristics of patients with NFPAs, except for age at surgery, are not correlated with the Ki-67 LI. Moreover, the Ki-67 LI does not seem to provide independent information to identify patients at high risk for tumor recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available