4.6 Article

Fine-scale endemism of Amazonian birds in a threatened landscape

Journal

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 2683-2694

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-013-0546-9

Keywords

Amazonia; Areas of endemism; Conservation; Deforestation; Cryptic endemism; Phylogeography

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq 290034/2008-12, CNPq 150842/2012-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The region recognized as the Rondnia area of endemism is one of the most threatened in the Brazilian Amazon. In addition to rampant deforestation that took place during the 1980s and 1990s, it is now the locus of infrastructure development and economic expansion. However, the patterns of species distribution and diversity in this region are much more complex than previously recognized. Patterns of distribution of birds, primates, and butterflies strongly suggest that the Rondnia area of endemism is not biogeographically homogenous. On opposite banks of the Madeira tributaries, in particular the Aripuan and Jiparana rivers, there are genetically, morphologically, and vocally distinct bird populations with restricted distributions and geographic substitution. These areas are relatively small and already highly threatened by deforestation and economic development. Up to 70 % of the Jiparana basin has been deprived of its original forest cover. Thus, their unique populations deserve to be recognized as conservation priorities and urgently included in conservation planning blueprints. Many restricted taxa, including many yet to be described, may already be highly endangered or locally extinct. Conservation planning in the Brazilian Amazon directed at specifying areas to be protected has focused on the larger proposed areas of endemism. If fine-scale endemism in threatened areas does exist in other Amazonian regions, then conservation policies that do not recognize these patterns will not adequately protect regional diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available