4.4 Article

Organic carbon isotope ratios (δ13C) of Arctic Amerasian Continental shelf sediments

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 522-532

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s005310000121

Keywords

Arctic Amerasian shelf; sediment carbon and nitrogen isotopes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic matter origins are inferred from carbon isotope ratios (delta C-13) in recent continental shelf sediments and major rivers from 465 locations from the north Bering-Chukchi-East Siberian-Beaufort Sea, Arctic Amerasia. Generally, there is a cross-shelf increase in delta C-13, which is due to progressive increased contribution seaward of marine-derived organic carbon to surface sediments. This conclusion is supported by the correlations between sediment delta C-13, OC/N, and delta N-15. The sources of total organic carbon (TOC) to the Amerasian margin sediments are primarily from marine water-column phytoplankton and terrigenous C-3 plants constituted of tundra taiga and angiosperms. In contrast to more temperate regions, the source of TOC from terrigenous C-4 and CAM plants to the study area is probably insignificant because these plants do not exist in the northern high latitudes. The input of carbon to the northern Alaskan shelf sediments from nearshore kelp community (Laminaria solidungula) is generally insignificant as indicated by the absence of high sediment delta C-13 values (-16.5 to -13.6 parts per thousand) which are typical of the macrophytes. Our study suggests that the isotopic composition of sediment TOC has potential application in reconstructing temporal changes in delivery and accumulation of organic matter resulting from glacial-interglacial changes in sea level and environments. Furthermore, recycling and advection of the extensive deposits of terrestrially derived organic matter from land, or the wide Amerasian margin, could be a mechanism for elevating total CO2 and pCO(2) in the Arctic Basin halocline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available