4.2 Article

Neural tube defects in Victoria, Australia: potential contributing factors and public health implications

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb00521.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To measure population prevalence and determine potential predictors of neural tube defects. Method: Analysis of all births reported to a mandated collection of perinatal data, and terminations prior to 20 weeks' gestation that have been reported to a data collection of birth defects in Victoria from 1983 to 1997. Prevalence at birth and risk ratios of infant and maternal characteristics associated with neural tube defects were calculated. Results: Prevalence of spina bifida has remained steady for 15 years and was 8.8/10,000 in 1997. Anencephaly increased to 7.9/10,000 in 1997. After exclusion of pregnancy terminations, the 1997 birth prevalence was 4.5/10,000 for spina bifida and 2.4/10,000 for anencephaly. Neural tube defects are identified in 1 in 1600 fetuses, the risk being significantly higher for epileptic women (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 3.70, 95% Cl 2.25-6.07), multiple births (AOR = 4.56, 95%Cl 3.46-6.02), teenage mothers (AOR = 1.47, 95% Cl 1.09-2.00) compared with those aged 25-29, and women with three or more previous pregnancies (AOR=1.40, 95% Cl 1.10-1.78). The risk was lower for women of East Asian (AOR=0.70, 95% Cl 0.49-1.00) and Middle Eastern origin (AOR=0.60, 95% Cl 0.35-1.02) and these differences were approaching statistical significance. Conclusion Total prevalence of neural tube defects did not decline up to 1997. Implications: It is unlikely that targeting 'at risk' groups identified in this study would make a difference to neural tube defect incidence. However, consideration could be given to identifying larger 'at risk' groups such as those with homocysteine metabolism defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available