4.4 Article

Chinese hamster ovary cell performance enhanced by a rational divide-and-conquer strategy for chemically defined medium development

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages 690-696

Publisher

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.04.016

Keywords

Basal medium design; Chemical-defined; Chinese hamster ovary; High-yielding; Monoclonal antibody

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21106045, 21206040]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA02A303]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project [2013ZX10004003-003-003]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WF1214035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Basal medium design is considered one of the most important steps in process development. To optimize chemically defined (CD) media efficiently and effectively for the biopharmaceutical industry, a two-step rational strategy was applied to optimize four antibody producing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines. In the first step, 48 of 52 components of our in-house medium were divided into three groups according to their characteristics. In the next step, these groups were optimized by spent medium analysis, response surface methodology and mixture design. Because these steps in our strategy involved dividing medium components into groups and subsequently adjusting the concentration of the components, we termed this medium development strategy divide and conquer. By applying the strategy, we were able to improve the titers of CHO-S, CHO-DG44 and two CHO-K1 cell lines 1.92, 1.86, 2.92 and 1.62-fold, respectively, in 8 weeks with fewer than 60 tests. This divide-and-conquer strategy was efficient, effective, scalable and universal in our current study and offered a new approach to CD media development. (c) 2015, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available