4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Apical endocytosis in rat hepatocytes in situ involves clathrin, traverses a subapical compartment, and leads to lysosomes

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 6, Pages 1692-1707

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.20233

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: This study demonstrates and characterizes apical (canalicular) endocytic pathways in hepatocytes in situ. Methods: Endocytic markers were administered by retrograde infusion through the common bile duct. Colocalization with proteins that are specific for various endocytic compartments was performed on stacks of deconvoluted confocal immunofluorescence images. The subcellular distribution of marker proteins was assessed by electron microscopy (EM). Results: Bulk-phase, as well as membrane-associated markers, were internalized readily at the apical cell pole. At the EM level, marker was found initially in 60-100-nm tubulovesicular structures and 150-200-nm cup-shaped vesicles, whereas multivesicular bodies and lysosomes became labeled after longer time intervals. Apical endocytosis involved clathrin and delivered marker to late endosomes (rab7(+), cathepsin D+), as well as lysosomes (rab7(-), cathepsin D+). Simultaneous labeling of the basolateral endocytic route resulted in overlap of both pathways in the late endosomal and lysosomal compartments. in addition, apical endocytosis involved a subapical compartment (endolyn-78(+), rab11(+), polymeric IgA receptor [pIgA-R+]) that is passed by the transcytotic route, thus constituting a crossroads, pIgA-R immunoreactivity probably reflecting the cleaved receptor fragment, was associated with apical endocytic marker and colocalized with clathrin and later with cathepsin D. Conclusions: Apical endocytosis involves coated pits/vesicles, leads to a subapical compartment, and plays a role in the retrieval of canalicular plasma membrane components for lysosomal degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available