4.4 Article

Trichloroethylene cometabolic degradation by Rhodococcus sp L4 induced with plant essential oils

Journal

BIODEGRADATION
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 281-291

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10532-008-9220-4

Keywords

Trichloroethylene; Cometabolic degradation; Plant essential oils; Toluene-degrading bacteria; Rhodococcus

Funding

  1. National Center of Excellence for Environmental and Hazardous Waste Management (NCE-EHWM)
  2. 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund, Chulalongkorn University
  3. Environmental Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cometabolic degradation of TCE by toluene-degrading bacteria has the potential for being a cost-effective bioremediation technology. However, the application of toluene may pose environmental problems. In this study, several plant essential oils and their components were examined as alternative inducer for TCE cometabolic degradation in a toluene-degrading bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. L4. Using the initial TCE concentration of 80 mu M, lemon and lemongrass oil-grown cells were capable of 20 +/- A 6% and 27 +/- A 8% TCE degradation, which were lower than that of toluene-grown cells (57 +/- A 5%). The ability of TCE degradation increased to 36 +/- A 6% when the bacterium was induced with cumin oil. The induction of TCE-degrading enzymes was suggested to be due to the presence of citral, cumin aldehyde, cumene, and limonene in these essential oils. In particular, the efficiency of cumin aldehyde and cumene as inducers for TCE cometabolic degradation was similar to toluene. TCE transformation capacities (T (c)) for these induced cells were between 9.4 and 15.1 mu g of TCE mg cells(-1), which were similar to the known toluene, phenol, propane or ammonia degraders. Since these plant essential oils are abundant and considered non-toxic to humans, they may be applied to stimulate TCE degradation in the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available