4.7 Article

Results of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium protocols for children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1981-1995)

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 2247-2256

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401980

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukemia; childhood; asparaginase; doxorubicin

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 68484, CA 06516] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL consortium has been conducting clinical trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) since 1981. The treatment backbone has included intensive, multi-agent remission induction, early intensification with weekly, high-dose asparaginase, cranial radiation for the majority of patients, frequent vincristine/corticosteroid pulses during post-remission therapy, and for high-risk patients, doxorubicin during intensification. Between 1981 and 1995, 1255 children with newly diagnosed ALL were evaluated on four consecutive protocols: 81-01 (1981-1985), 85-01 (1985-1987), 87-01 (1987-1991) and 91-01 (1991-1995). The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates (+/- standard error) for all patients by protocol were as follows: 74 +/- 3% (81-01), 78 +/- 3% (85-01), 77 +/- 2% (87-01) and 83 +/- 2% (91-01). The B-year EFS rates ranged from 78 to 85% for patients with B-progenitor phenotype retrospectively classified as NCI standard-risk, 63-82% for NCI high-risk B-progenitor patients, and 70-79% for patients with T cell phenotype. Results of randomized studies revealed that neither high-dose methotrexate during induction (protocol 87-01) nor high-dose g-mercaptopurine during intensification (protocol 91-01) were associated with improvement in EFS compared with standard doses. Current studies continue to focus on improving efficacy while minimizing acute and late toxicities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available