Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Statistical tools to interpret risks that arise from rare events in host specificity testing
Toni M. Withers et al.
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL (2013)
Mode of inheritance of increased host acceptance in a seed beetle
F. J. Messina et al.
BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2012)
Differing acceptance of familiar and unfamiliar plant species by an oligophagous beetle
Anne Kuehnle et al.
ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA (2009)
Choosing the right plants to test:: The host-specificity of Longitarsus sp (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) a potential biological control agent of Heliotropium amplexicaule
D. T. Briese et al.
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL (2008)
Native-range research assists risk analysis for non-targets in weed biological control: the cautionary tale of the broom seed beetle
Andy Sheppard et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY (2006)
Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plants
AW Sheppard et al.
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL (2005)
Evolutionary aspects of host plant specialisation -: a study on bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)
T Jermy et al.
OIKOS (2003)
Time-dependent changes in the host-acceptance threshold of insects: Implications for host specificity testing of candidate biological control agents
LB Browne et al.
BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2002)
Re-test of Rhinocyllus conicus host specificity, and the prediction of ecological risk in biological control
AE Arnett et al.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2002)
A general model for host plant selection in phytophagous insects
SA West et al.
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY (2002)
Estimating fundamental host range:: a host-specificity study of a potential biocontrol agent for Prosopis species (Leguminosae)
RD Van Klinken et al.
BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
