4.5 Article

Limitation of infarct size in rabbit hearts by the novel adenosine receptor agonist AMP 579 administered at reperfusion

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 12, Pages 2339-2347

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1264

Keywords

cardioprotection; leukocytes; myocardial infarction; myocardial ischemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel A(1)/A(2) adenosine receptor agonist AMP 579 has been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size in pig and dog. The present study tested the effect of AMP 579 in two rabbit models. In open-chest rabbits undergoing 30 min of regional ischemia and 3 h of reperfusion AMP 579 (3 mug/min/kg) reduced infarct size when treatment was started either 10 min before ischemia or 10 min prior to reperfusion from 36.4+/-3.1% of the risk zone in untreated hearts to 11.8+/-4.4 and 12.3+/-1.0%, respectively. To determine whether protection observed when the drug was administered shortly before reperfusion represented a long-lasting effect rather than merely a transient delay of necrosis, the chest wound was closed in layers and the rabbits permitted to recover. After 3 days the hearts were removed to evaluate infarct size. Continued limitation of infarct size after 3 days of reperfusion (8.2+/-2.8% of the risk zone) confirmed that sustained tissue salvage had been conferred by the drug. In isolated, buffer-perfused rabbit hearts undergoing 30 min of regional ischemia and 2 h of reperfusion, AMP 579 again limited infarct size (8.6+/-2.9% of the risk zone) when treatment started 10 min prior to reperfusion, arguing against an anti-leukocyte mechanism of protection. AMP 579's protective effect in this in vitro model was abrogated by 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline, indicating that it was mediated through adenosine receptors. We conclude that AMP 579 given just prior to reperfusion may be an effective anti-infarct intervention. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available