4.7 Article

In-shock cooling in numerical simulations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 319, Issue 3, Pages 721-727

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03723.x

Keywords

hydrodynamics; shock waves; methods : numerical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We model a one-dimensional shock-tube using smoothed particle hydrodynamics and investigate the consequences of having finite shock-width in numerical simulations caused by finite resolution of the codes. We investigate the cooling of gas during passage through the shock for three different cooling regimes. For a theoretical shock temperature of 10(5) K, the maximum temperature of the gas is much reduced. When the ratio of the cooling time to shock-crossing time was 8, we found a reduction of 25 per cent in the maximum temperature reached by the gas. When the ratio was reduced to 1.2, the maximum temperature reached dropped to 50 per cent of the theoretical value. In both cases the cooling time was reduced by a factor of 2. At lower temperatures, we are especially interested in the production of molecular hydrogen, and so we follow the ionization level and H-2 abundance across the shock. The effect of in-shock cooling is substantial: the maximum temperature the gas reaches compared with the theoretical temperature is found to vary between 0.15 and 0.81, depending upon the shock strength and mass resolution. The downstream ionization level is reduced from the theoretical level by a factor of between 2.4 and 12.5, and the resulting H-2 abundance by a factor of 1.35 to 2.22. At temperatures above 10(5) K, radiative shocks are unstable and will oscillate. We find that the shock jump temperature varies by a factor of 20 because of these oscillations. We conclude that extreme caution must be exercised when interpreting the results of simulations of galaxy formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available