4.6 Article

A validation study comparing accelerator MS and liquid scintillation counting for analysis of 14C-labelled drugs in plasma, urine and faecal extracts

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 197-209

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00397-6

Keywords

accelerator mass spectrometry; low dose radioactive studies; drug metabolism; mass balance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparison has been made between accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) analysis and liquid scintillation counting (LSC) of plasma, urine and faecal samples containing C-14-labelled drugs. In an in vitro study in which human plasma was spiked (the term spiked is used in Section 2.6) with C-14-Fluconazole (C-14-FL) over a concentration range of 0.1-2.5 dpm/ml, a correlation coefficient of 0.999 was determined for AMS analysis versus extrapolated LSC data. No significant day to day (or inter-day)variation was seen (P < 0.05 by ANOVA). Coefficients of variation for these analyses ranged from 2.68 to 6.50%. In vivo studies in which rats were given a high (11.5 Ci/kg) or low (18.1 nCi/kg) radioactive dose (to model an exposure of 0.9 mu Sievert to man) of C-14-Fluticasone propionate(C-14-FP) showed that there was also a good correspondence between AMS and LSC data. A mass balance study in a single rat given the 0.9 mu Sievert human modelling dose of C-14-FP demonstrated that over 80% of the dose was excreted in the faeces by 96 h; less than 1% of the administered dose was excreted in the urine. The limit of reliable measurement of drug related material, above background concentrations, by AMS analysis in this study was approximately 0.1 dpm/ml for plasma, 0.01 dpm/ml for urine without any sample extraction or concentration and 0.01 dpm/ml for faecal extracts. The data reported here demonstrate that AMS is an ultrasensitive and reliable method for analysing C-14-labelled drugs in human and animal body fluids. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available