4.6 Article

P2Y2 purinergic and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors activate different phospholipase C-β isoforms that are uniquely susceptible to protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation and inactivation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 275, Issue 50, Pages 39767-39772

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M007775200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL063921] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activation of phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta) by G protein-coupled receptors typically results in rapid but transient second messenger generation. Although PLC-beta deactivation may contribute to the transient nature of this response, the mechanisms governing PLC-beta deactivation are poorly characterized. We investigated the involvement of protein kinase C (PKC) in the termination of PLC-beta activation induced by endogenous P2Y(2) purinergic receptors and transfected M-3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Activation of P2Y(2) receptors causes G alpha (q/11) to associate with PLC-beta3, whereas M3 mAChR activation causes G alpha (q/11) to associate with both PLC-beta1 and PLC-beta3 in these cells. Phosphorylation of PLC-beta3, but not PLC-beta1, is induced by activating either P2Y(2) receptors or M-3 mAChR. We demonstrate that PKC rather than protein kinase A mediates the G protein-coupled receptor-induced phosphorylation of PLC-beta3. The PKC-mediated phosphorylation of PLC-beta3 diminishes the interaction of G alpha (q/11) with PLC-beta3, thereby contributing to the termination PLC-beta3 activity. These findings indicate that the distinct temporal profiles of PLC activation by P2Y(2) receptors and mAChR may arise from the differential activation of PLC-beta1 and PLC-beta3 by the receptors, coupled with a selective PKC-mediated negative feedback mechanism that targets PLC-beta3 but not PLC-beta1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available