4.7 Article

Longitudinal study of moderate weight change and sleep-disordered breathing

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 284, Issue 23, Pages 3015-3021

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR03186] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL62252] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [AG14124-05] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Excess body weight is positively associated with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), a prevalent condition in the US general population. No large study has been conducted of the longitudinal association between SDB and change in weight. Objective To measure the independent longitudinal association between weight change and change in SDB severity. Design Population-based, prospective cohort study conducted from July 1989 to January 2000. Setting and Participants Six hundred ninety randomly selected employed Wisconsin residents (mean age at baseline, 46 years; 56% male) who were evaluated twice at 4-year intervals for SDB. Main Outcome Measures Percentage change in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; apnea events + hypopnea events per hour of sleep) and odds of developing moderate-to-severe SDB (defined by an AHI greater than or equal to 15 events per hour of sleep), with respect to change in weight. Results Relative to stable weight, a 10% weight gain predicted an approximate 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20%-45%) increase in the AHI, A 10% weight loss predicted a 26% (95% CI, 18%-34%) decrease in the AHI. A 10% increase in weight predicted a 6-fold (95% CI, 2.2-17.0) increase in the odds of developing moderate-to-severe SDB. Conclusions Our data indicate that clinical and public health programs that result in even modest weight control are likely to be effective in managing SDB and reducing new occurrence of SDB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available