4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison between Pyrococcus horikoshii and Pyrococcus abyssi genome sequences reveals linkage of restriction-modification genes with large genome polymorphisms

Journal

GENE
Volume 259, Issue 1-2, Pages 109-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00459-5

Keywords

genome evolution; genome rearrangement; illegitimate recombination; mobile genetic element; selfish gene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent work suggests that restriction-modification gene complexes are mobile genetic elements that insert themselves into the genome and cause various genome rearrangements. In the present work, the complete genome sequences of Pyrococcus horikoshii and Pyrococcus abyssi, two species in a genus of hyperthermophilic archaeon (archaebacterium), were compared to detect large genome polymorphisms linked with restriction-modification gene homologs. Sequence alignments, GC content analysis, and codon usage analysis demonstrated the diversity of these homologs and revealed a possible case of relatively recent acquisition (horizontal transfer). In two cases out of the six large polymorphisms identified, there was insertion of a DNA segment with a modification gene homolog, accompanied by target deletion (simple substitution). In two other cases: homologous DNA segments carrying a modification gene homolog were present at different locations in the two genomes (transposition), In both cases, substitution (insertion/deletion) in one of the two loci was accompanied by inversion of adjacent chromosomal segment. In the fifth case, substitution by a DNA segment carrying type I restriction, modification, and specificity gene homologs was likewise accompanied by adjacent inversion. In the last case, two homologous DNA segments, were found at different loci in the two genomes (transposition), but only one of them had insertion of a modification homolog and an unknown ORF. The possible relationship of these polymorphisms to attack by restriction enzymes on the chromosome will be discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available