4.7 Article

Extreme discordant phenotype methodology: an intuitive approach to clinical pharmacogenetics

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 410, Issue 2-3, Pages 107-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00809-8

Keywords

pharmacogenetic; pharmacogenomic; molecular epidemiology; genotype; phenotype; DNA sequence variants; population genetic; patient-pair studies

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 R01 ES06321, R01 ES08147, R01 ES10416, P30 ES06096] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pharmacogenetics represents the study of variability in drug response due to heredity. Of the more than six dozen pharmacogenetic differences described in the medical literature, the majority of these variations occurs in drug-metabolizing enzyme genes and others in drug receptor and drug transporter genes, whereas many others have not yet been explained on a molecular basis. It is clear that drug efficacy or drug toxicity represents a multiplex phenotype, i.e. interaction between the drug (or its metabolites) and the gene products (enzymes, receptors, other targets) of two, and usually many more than two, genes. Because there is a gradient in these phenotypes (efficacy or toxicity), it is extremely important to select patients having the most unequivocal phenotype possible-if one wishes to find the gene(s) responsible for the trait. The method of extreme discordant phenotype (EDP) is therefore highly recommended. Using EDP methodology, DNA sequence variants (genotype) can be unconditionally correlated with drug efficacy or toxicity (phenotype). EDP methodology is mathematically intuitive and, in essence, has been used in a number of previous clinical pharmacogenetic studies. This EDP approach should be applicable to virtually any pharmaceutical agent in patient populations. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available